Cholesterol Scam Generates one Trillion Dollars a Year in revenue for Big Pharma!

Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels’ was a master at making the masses believe anything the government wanted them to believe. One of his most famous quotes was, “A lie told once is a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.” The American public has been brainwashed and dumbed down by one of the world’s most successful propagandists in history; his concepts have been put into action within the medical industry. A typical example is the across the board statement physicians are telling their patients regarding the cholesterol myth. You have high cholesterol and you should be on a statin drug.

This exact scenario was presented to one of my patients. Fortunately for him he consulted me regarding his elevated cholesterol level. I told my patient sarcastically that statin drugs are wonderful; they only are effective in one out of 100 patients. In addition, by lowering the cholesterol levels your brain cannot repair itself and dementia sets in. Also stains cause type II diabetes, causes congestive heart failure, tears up your liver and kidneys and if that isn’t bad enough it destroys muscle tissue, rhabdomyolysis, through out your body. This is why so many patients complain of muscle pain.

A new paper cites nearly 900 studies on the adverse effects of statins, which are a class of drugs widely used to treat high cholesterol. The realistic range for cholesterol is 200 to 250 and not levels below 200. This artificial level was conveniently set by the drug industry to sell more statins. Statin drugs are some of the most unnecessary drugs on the market today. Because their use is based on a misinformed notion that cholesterol is the nemesis of good health in the first place. For starters, some of the possible consequences of taking statins in high doses, or for a lengthy period of time, include:

• Cognitive loss
• Neuropathy
• Anemia
• Acidosis
• Frequent fevers
• Cataracts
• Sexual dysfunction

Other serious and potentially life threatening side effects include, but are not limited to:

• An increase in cancer risk
• Immune system suppression
• Serious degenerative muscle tissue condition (rhabdomyolysis)
• Pancreatic dysfunction
• Hepatic dysfunction. (Due to the potential increase in liver enzymes, patients must be monitored for normal liver function)

My patient presented the following blood value comparisons:

December 2018

Lipid Profile	Value	Reference Range
Cholesterol	232	below 200 (mg/DL)
Triglyceride	81	0 – 150 (mg/DL)
High density lipoprotein	49	greater than 40 (mg/DL)
Very Low Density lipoprotein	16
Low density lipoprotein	167	less than 130 (mg/DL)
Chol/HDL ratio	4.7	3.0 – 6.5

Six months later my patients blood test showed normal values. A basic nutritional supplement program was used to normalize his cholesterol

June 2019

Lipid Profile	Value	Reference Range
Cholesterol	192	below 200 (mg/DL)
Triglyceride	81	0 – 150 (mg/DL)
High density lipoprotein	47	greater than 40 (mg/DL)
Very Low Density lipoprotein	16
Low density lipoprotein	129	less than 130 (mg/DL)
Chol/HDL ratio	4.1	3.0 – 6.5

If you had a choice between taking a potentially toxic drug or taking natural food based supplements, what would you choose?